Drug safety risk warning
mRNA moratorium NOW!
MWM - Human Science and Medicine
"Science thrives on doubt, not certainty."
Richard Feynman, Nobel Prize for quantum electrodynamics, visionary of nanotechnology
René Descartes, mathematician, philosopher, founder of methodical doubt as the basis of modern science
We have doubts
regarding the benefit-harm balance of the novel vaccines* with modified mRNA. The scientifically documented consequences are explained clearly in our four-page document and backed up with the most important of the numerous studies.There is more than an initial suspicion
that the mRNA vaccines do more harm than good. Anyone who does not allow doubts, who does not face up to the debate, has something to hide. Science has always been a process of finding the truth. Why has such a process of doubt been so harshly suppressed in politics, science and the media?Risk warning on drug safety:
mRNA moratorium
Immediate STOP and scientific dispute
on the benefit-harm balance of mRNA vaccines *
Do you agree with the immediate stop
and reconsideration of mRNA substances?
Please sign here!
Documentation from 12.10.2025, 3 pm CEST (Berlin/Paris)
With the partner CSmedicus.org: ON RUMBLE and on YOUTUBE
PDF download of the risk warning
Who are we and why do we doubt?
Scientists, truth-seeking doctors and healthcare professionals as well as responsible citizens must have doubts when something is not clearly proven and also has life-threatening consequences. Doubt and critical hypothesis testing are essential for human science and medicine! If you want to rebuild trust in politics and science, you need binding values. Science without discourse is dogmatism. Who wants dogmatic medicine and science instead of discourse about the best possible solution?
What evidence is there?
The evidence exists at epidemiological, medical, biological, chemical, biophysical, psychosomatic and pathophysiological levels. The correlations of mRNA substances with death and disease figures have been significant since 2022 at the latest in a comparison of federal states, nations, international databases and their vaccination/booster status and can no longer be dismissed as "coincidental". What theories on the causes of these abnormalities have been substantiated? The possible causal chains due to the mRNA vaccines* have been documented internationally in numerous "peer-reviewed" studies.
Why is it important that the extreme risks of genetic mRNA substances are publicized?
The EMA has approved further genetic mRNA substances that are now even "self-amplifying". There is an "on button", but how to push the "off button" has not been documented. If doctors and scientists and all citizens do not clearly support a scientific investigation, the risk of genetic damage after all conventional vaccines are switched to mRNA technology is extremely high. The incalculable risk for an entire generation of children is almost unimaginable.
The evidence for the harmful effects exists at epidemiological, medical, biological, chemical, biophysical, psychosomatic and pathophysiological levels. With regard to cancer risk alone, 17 ways in which these mRNA injections can cause cancer have now been documented, and the temporal correlations of mRNA substances with death and morbidity figures have been significant since 2022 at the latest in a comparison of federal states, nations and international databases (including VAERS) and can no longer be dismissed as "coincidental". What theories on the causes of these abnormalities have been comprehensibly substantiated by the responsible authorities? The possible causalities (including molecular biological) due to the mRNA vaccines* have been documented internationally in numerous peer-reviewed studies. A risk warning from the authorities is long overdue, inquiries are not answered and data is blacked out. We hope for a change!
How should it be solved? CURRENT DATES
1st national and international press conferences
16.09.2025 | 14.00-16.00 (CEST) German-language press conference. VIDEO RECORDING SEE BELOW
Spokespersons of MWM are: Prof. Dr. Gerald Dyker (organic chemistry), Christina Del Prete (pharmacist, alternative practitioner), Prof. Dr. Andreas Sönnichsen (scientist, physician), Dr. Erich Freisleben (physician), Dr. Kurt E. Müller (co-founder of environmental medicine), Prof. Dr. Kurt Beck (economist, statistician), Dr. priv. Doz. Michael Nehls (molecular geneticist, expert of the Enquetekom. dt. Bundestag). Prof. Dr. Dr. Christian Schubert (physician, psychologist, psychoneuroimmunologist). Moderation: Dr. Dirk V. Seeling (psychologist, editor, publisher).
02.10.2025 | 3 p.m. (CEST) ONBOARDING-Meeting Grp 1 for Speakers in the International Online-Pressconference "World Journey of Truth About mRNA-Vaccines"
08.10.2025 | 09.00 a.m. (CEST) ONBOARDING-Meeting Grp 2 for Speakers.
Onboarding process: You, as a speaker, have questions and want to meet us and the partners online. Cooperation partners are for example MWGFD e.V., North Group, World Council of Health (WCH) and others are coming too. As journalist, influencer plaese verify by email and link to an article of you and your ortganisation: D@mwm-proof.com
09.10.2025 | 3 p.m. (CEST) International Online-Pressconference "World Journey of Truth About mRNA-Vaccines" (For Journalists and Speakers. For Journalists and Speakers: Recorded) Documentation on CSmedicus in YouTube or in Rumble.
30 speakers from 20 countries explain in 2 minutes what is destroying confidence in this mRNA technology in their country in particular. Cooperation partners are North Group, World Council for Health (WCH), Sound of Truth, MWGFD, Gesellschaft für Österreich and others. Would you like to join our journey as a key speaker, as a group from your country or as a journalist/influencer? Then please write to us: D@mwm-proof.com
JOURNALISTS: Afterwards, journalists will have the opportunity to ask questions. Our journey through the world of truth, from Australia to Asia, Africa, Europe, Latin America and the USA, is unique. It is exclusively for journalists, will be recorded and broadcast 3 days later, Sunday, October 12, 2025, at 3 p.m. (CEST) around the world. As a journalist, you have three days to write and discuss about it. Would you like to take part as a journalist, influencer or broadcaster? Write to us: J@mwm-proof.com
30 speakers from 20 countries explain in 2 minutes what is specifically destroying trust in this mRNA-technology in their country. Cooperation partners are North Group, World Council for Health (WCH), Sound of Truth, MWGFD, Gesellschaft für Österreich and others. You want to join our Journey as an important speaker, a group of your country or as a journalist/influencer? Please write us: D@mwm-proof.com
JOURNALISTST: Subsequently, journalists will have the chance to ask questions. Our journey through the world of truth, from Australia across Asia, Africa, Europe, Latin America, the US is unique. It is exclusively for journalists and influencers. After the conference you have three days to write and discuss about it before we broadcast it into many channels of the world. You want to participate as journalist, influencer? Write us: J@mwm-proof.com
12.10.2025 | 3 p.m. (CEST) PREMIER: BROADCAST FOR EVERYONE FOR FREE! International Online-Pressconference "World Journey of Truth About mRNA-Vaccines" | Premiere: Public broadcast for everyone for free!
Including CSmedicus in YouTube or in Rumble
A Cooperation of MWGFD, North Group, WCH, GfÖ, CSmedicus u.a.
Speakers: Peter A. McCullough, E V Rapiti (South Africa), Andreas Sönnichsen, Klaus Steger, Paul Cullen, Ros Jones, Laura Teodori, Christina Del Prete, Alexandra H. Caude, Francois-M. Perier, Angelika Mihalik, Eva Papp, Engelbert Paschek, Walter Weber, Helmut Sterz, Gerald Dyker, Helen Lasn, Gerd Morgenthaler, Jonathan Gilthorpe, Annette Rungby, Maria Hubmer-Mogg, Christof Plothe, Atapol Sughondhabirom, Jun Ueda, Robyn Cosford, Gigi Foster; Lynda Wharton. Moderation: Dirk Seeling
Further information: Menu item World premiere
2. Dialogue with politicians at grassroots level and worldwide - expert panels on the mRNA moratorium
An expert panel "mRNA moratorium" consisting of representatives of the original signatories, manufacturers, government regulatory bodies should come together. All should be obliged to submit a proposal to verify the various hypotheses, based on the fundamental principles of evidence-based medicine.
The signatories are not anti-pharmaceutical or anti-innovation. They expect compliance with minimum standards of drug safety that are required of any natural product (e.g. dandelion extract) that has been tried and tested for thousands of years.
Many European citizens are frustrated with Brussels centralism, which has also led to more and more centralism and frustration among the population in the nations of Europe. A centralized vaccination obligation carries an even greater risk of corruption and dogmatic rather than professional decision-making. The basis should be every citizen's right to self-determination over their body and soul. A global specification of measures by the WHO, as recently stipulated in the International Health Regulations, is therefore just as dangerous for health as a national vaccination requirement for experimental, fast-track mRNA vaccines. Educating politicians in the region, state parliament, Bundestag, European Parliament, UN is necessary if we want evidence-based rather than ideologically or economically driven healthcare. ARE YOU A POLITICIAN AND WANT TO DIALOGUE WITH US? Please feel free to email us: D@mwm-proof.com
How can this be specifically addressed?
Our risk warning is compact and well-founded. The first page summarizes what is supported by 14 hypotheses on the next three pages. Some of the most important evidence and literature references are numbered accordingly on the "Documents & Media" subpage. We are aware that there are other studies that appear to document contrary results. That is why a constructive, neutrally moderated discussion is needed to get closer to the truth. Unlike in the committees of inquiry, however, the arguments also need to be examined in greater depth. An expert panel "mRNA moratorium" must therefore make the core arguments of the groups verifiable in a well-moderated manner on the basis of the core points of medical evidence presented.
Why is this important now?
Neither "scientific camp" should be accused of stupidity or corruption. The experts in both camps are smart and their views are based on studies and figures that are peer-reviewed. Without curiosity about the views of the "other", ignoring and discrediting the "other" will cause lasting scientific and social damage. The credibility and reputation of all medical solutions will be destroyed with the "framing" of the past!
More background ...
on the diagnosis, causes and individualized medical measures of post-vaccine syndrome and post-COVID can be found in the anthology "Long/Post COVID and mRNA Vaccine Side Effects", published by www.Sound-of-truth.com. In this top-rated non-fiction book (5 out of 5 stars), over 40 scientific and medical experts from Germany, Switzerland and Austria explain what went wrong, what the reasons for this might be and what solutions are available at a medical and health policy level. Our networks have found more effective solutions than just "pacing", as important as that is. DOUBT IS HEALTHY AND WORTHWHILE IN THE LONG TERM! Let's check together if it was the biggest blessing or the biggest medical scam. We are open to surprises! Sign here if you also want clarity
Your signature to verify the known risks:
- Personally: Sign the risk warning and stay informed. Our online press conference from 16.09.2025 as a video can be found in the next paragraph.
- Networking as an organization: On 09.10.2025 (3 p.m. CET) the "Journey of Truth About mRNA Vaccines" will take place- Join in. Your 2-minute statement in English with other organizations presents the situation in your country. On 02.10.25 there will be an onboading to clarify all questions. Let's join forces!
If you are a politician, journalist or influencer
Email us if you would like to attend the press conference or send your specific questions to the email address D@mwm-proof.com. We will treat your inquiries as strictly confidential! Please verify yourself in your email with a link to a post/webpage that shows a photo of you.
Video of the press conference on September 16, 2025
00:00:00-00:09:24: Dr. Dirk V. Seeling - Moderation, introduction (psychologist, ed, publisher)
00:09:24-00:20:11: Prof. Dr. Gerald Dyker (Prof. for Organic Chemistry)
00:20:16-00:31:28: Prof. Dr. Andreas Sönnichsen (scientist, physician)
00:31:31-00:41:05: Dr. med. Kurt E. Müller (co-founder of environmental medicine)
00:41:06-00:53:51: Prof. Dr. oec. Konstantin Beck (economist, statistician)
00:53:53-01:11:06: Dr. med. PD Michael Nehls (molecular geneticist, expert of the Enquetekom. dt. Bundestag)
01:11:34-01:20:16: Dr. med. Erich Freisleben (physician)
01:20:55-01:31:40: Christina Del Prete (pharmacist, alternative practitioner)
01:31:57-01:36:23: Prof. Dr. Dr. Christian Schubert (physician, psychologist, professor of psychoneuroimmunology)
01:37:19-02:12:02: Press questions and answers
From the press
Berliner Zeitung (17.09.2025)
Hundreds of scientists call for mRNA vaccines to be stopped: How serious are the side effects?
Criticism of mRNA preparations is growing: thousands of side effects, unanswered safety questions - scientists are calling for a moratorium and an urgent re-evaluation.
Read more: https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/coronavirus/hunderte-wissenschaftler-fordern-stopp-mrna-impfstoffe-li.2357340
Further articles can be found here: Documents and Media
Video statements by some speakers and signatories
"Why we doubt the mRNA vaccines*!"
- Dr. med. Kurt E. Müller: scientist, doctor, co-founder of environmental medicine .
- Kristina Wolf: alternative practitioner and MWGFD representative. She has experience with and from the doctors' network, hotline + laboratory.
- Prof. Dr. Gerald Dyker: Professor of Organic Chemistry at the Ruhr University in Bochum.
- Dr. med. Walter Weber: Doctor of medicine, internist | specialist for cancer and post-vac | founder of Ärzte f. Aufklärung e.V.
- Dr. med. Folker Meißner: General practitioner, holistic medicine, president of DAEMBE, energy and information physician.
- Kristin Hoffmann: Second chairwoman of the self-help association "Post-Vac-Hilfe e.V., co-founder of regional self-help groups
Dr. Kurt E. Müller, physician and founder of environmental medicine in Germany, former member of the expert commission at the RKI
Dr. Michael Nehls is an expert member of the German Bundestag's Corona Inquiry Commission, a habilitated molecular geneticist in immunology, a renowned and award-winning scientist in the field of immunology and genome research, and the author of numerous books.
The 14 theses that would have to be answered in the affirmative if the vaccines were safe and effective:
- From the point of view of the signatories, these questions cannot be answered unequivocally in the affirmative .
- The lack of efficacy was confirmed by Pfizer itself in the original Pfizer documents.
- The safety of the genetically modified mRNA technology is inadequate.
- The consequences are serious! Vaccination status correlates with excess mortality, stillbirths, chronic diseases, sick leave and the number of people in need of care.
- Ignoring highly significant correlations of r=.70 to r.90 and not investigating the causes is negligent!
- The responsible authorities have the core task of investigating the risk warnings from experts and affected groups.
➨ The public can make it clear that they are calling for a ban on mRNA substances and for an independent examination of the facts!
Have mRNA vaccines been independently and adequately tested and are they safe?
Is the risk-benefit ratio clearly positive?
Are the quantity, location and duration of the body's own production of foreign proteins (e.g. spikes) under control (pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics)? When does spike production end?
Are the criticisms of the safety of the vaccines refuted by histopathological findings?
Are there only a few rare adverse effects of mRNA vaccines?
Does mRNA vaccination protect against infection (self-protection)?
Do mRNA vaccines protect against transmission of the virus to others (protection of others)?
Do mRNA vaccines prevent severe disease in the event of infection?
Does multiple vaccination – ‘boosting’ – make sense?
Are the novel mRNA vaccines better than conventional vaccines and natural protective measures in terms of their risk-benefit ratio?
Are there really only a few acute vaccine side effects, and are these almost always harmless?
Are there really only a few medium-term vaccine side effects, and are these harmless?
Are there really no long-term vaccine damage after mRNA vaccinations?
Are consequential damage to fertility and live births ruled out?